Legal nurse consulting for plaintiff attorneys handling complex medical malpractice, wrongful death,
catastrophic injury, and emergency-care cases.
Legal nurse consulting for plaintiff attorneys handling complex medical malpractice, wrongful death, catastrophic injury, and emergency-care cases.
I help attorneys, insurance professionals, and organizations make sense of complex medical information, identify what happened, and determine what should have happened, so you can make informed decisions with confidence.

Comprehensive review for accuracy, chronology, and key findings.

A clear, defensible timeline of events based on the medical record.

Objective comparison of care provided against accepted standards.

Identification of missing, inconsistent, or conflicting information.

Clear, concise, fact-based summaries that tell the story.

Support with reports, depositions, and testimony preparation.

Evidence-based insight to strengthen your case.
I help attorneys, insurance professionals, and organizations make sense of complex medical information, identify what happened, and determine what should have happened, so you can make informed decisions with confidence.

Comprehensive review for accuracy, chronology, and key findings.

A clear, defensible timeline of events based on the medical record.

Objective comparison of care provided against accepted standards.

Identification of missing, inconsistent, or conflicting information.

Clear, concise, fact-based summaries that tell the story.

Support with reports, depositions, and testimony preparation.

Evidence-based insight to
strengthen your case.
Key clinical events and turning points
Potential deviations from expected practice
Delays in recognition, escalation, diagnosis, or treatment
Documentation inconsistencies and missing information
Possible causation concerns
Recommended next steps

In-depth review for accuracy, chronology, and key findings.

A clear timeline with identification of key events and causation considerations.

Objective comparison of care provided against accepted standards.

Identification of missing, inconsistent, or conflicting information.

Clear, concise, fact-based summaries that tell the story.

Support with reports, depositions, and testimony preparation.

Evidence-based insight to strengthen your case.

Strategic support for successful depositions and trial preparation.
Key clinical events and turning points
Potential deviations from expected practice
Delays in recognition, escalation, diagnosis, or treatment
Documentation inconsistencies and missing information
Possible causation concerns
Recommended next steps

In-depth review for accuracy, chronology, and key findings.

A clear timeline with identification of key events and causation considerations.

Objective comparison of care provided against accepted standards.

Identification of missing, inconsistent, or conflicting information.

Clear, concise, fact-based summaries that tell the story.

Support with reports, depositions, and testimony preparation.

Evidence-based insight to strengthen your case.

Strategic support for successful depositions and trial preparation.
My deepest clinical expertise is inemergency and acute-care environments, settings where conditions can change rapidly, communication matters, and minutes can determine outcomes.
I help legal teams understand not only what occurred, but whether deterioration was recognized, escalation was timely, and the system responded as expected.

Reconstruct the clinical chronology, key events and turning points

Determine what was recognized, when it was recognozed, by whom and whether change of condition were acted upon.

Examine the record, orders, interventions, policies, and systems surrounding the event.

Compare the care provided with expected standards, policies, guidelines, and clinical practice.

Identify documentation, communication, or system
gaps.

Identify missing, inconsistent, delayed, or conflicting documentation, communication, and system information.

Recognition or treatment that occurred later than the clinical picture warranted.

Missed deterioration, inadequate escalation, or delayed intervention.

Time-sensitive conditions where clinical decisions and response intervals matter.

Care delays related to crowding, placement, handoffs, or operational breakdown.

Breakdowns in charting, handoffs, notification, or interdisciplinary communication.

Processes, staffing, workflow, policies, or organizational conditions that may have influenced the outcome.
My deepest clinical expertise is inemergency and acute-care environments, settings where conditions can change rapidly, communication matters, and minutes can determine outcomes.
I help legal teams understand not only what occurred, but whether deterioration was recognized, escalation was timely, and the system responded as expected.

Reconstruct the clinical chronology, key events and turning points

Determine what was recognized, when it was recognized, by whom and whether change of condition were acted upon.

Examine the record, orders, interventions, policies, and systems surrounding the event.

Compare the care provided with expected standards, policies, guidelines, and clinical practice.

Identify documentation, communication, or system gaps.

Identify missing, inconsistent, delayed, or conflicting documentation, communication, and system information.

Recognition or treatment that occurred later than the clinical picture warranted.

Missed deterioration, inadequate escalation, or delayed intervention.

Time-sensitive conditions where clinical decisions and response intervals matter.

Care delays related to crowding, placement, handoffs, or operational breakdown.

Breakdowns in charting, handoffs, notification, or interdisciplinary communication.

Processes, staffing, workflow, policies, or organizational conditions that may have influenced the outcome.


We begin with an overview of the matter, the medical issues involved, and the clinical questions that need to be answered.


We determine the appropriate level of support based on the case, record volume, litigation stage, and objectives.


I review the medical documentation using the T.R.I.A.G.E. ™ framework to identify key events, deviations, gaps, and clinical concerns.


The record is translated into a clear clinical narrative showing what happened, when it happened, what should have happened, and where the story changed


You receive a clear work product, clinically grounded findings, and recommended next steps for case strategy.


We begin with an overview of the matter, the medical issues involved, and the clinical questions that need to be answered.


We determine the appropriate level of support based on the case, record volume, litigation stage, and objectives.


I review the medical documentation using the T.R.I.A.G.E. ™ framework to identify key events, deviations, gaps, and clinical concerns.


The record is translated into a clear clinical narrative showing what happened, when it happened, what should have happened, and where the story changed


You receive a clear work product, clinically grounded findings, and recommended next steps for case strategy.
“You don’t need another stack of records.
You need to know what the records mean.”
Making hidden system failures visible
and building the structure to fix them.
Home
About Sharonda
Healthcare Consulting
Legal Nurse Consulting
Speaking & Education
Media & Insights
Start the Conversation
Book a Speaking Engagement
Contact Sharonda's Team
Substack